Behind the US-NATO-UN Sponsored Brahimi Plan for Syria

In August 2012, Lakhdar Brahimi replaced Kofi Annan as special envoy from the United Nations and the Arab League to Syria.  In announcing the appointment, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon declared that Brahimi would employ “his talent and extraordinary experience” to lead Syria toward a “political transition in accordance with the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people.”  While western corporate media have hailed Brahimi for picking up where Annan left off, in fact Brahimi appears to have been selected to substitute for NATO’s failed pursuit of “regime change” the strategic choice to “sew chaos,” as reported by Global Research’s Thierry Meyssan.

As Meyssan documents, Brahimi’s “talent and extraordinary experience” include chairing the Commission for UN Peacekeeping Operations, a role in which he “never questioned the legal aberration that allowed the UN to create so-called peacekeeping forces in order to impose political solutions against the will of the warring parties”; masterminding the 2001 Bonn Agreement for Afghanistan that “put in place the present-day Afghan narco-regime”; and, as a member of the High Security Council, perpetrating the January 1992 coup d’etat in Algiers that nullified legislative election results, forced President Bendjedid to resign and installed putchist generals in power.  What followed in Algiers was a civil war, Meyssan writes, “precisely along the model that Washington now hopes to engender in Syria—where both sides are simultaneously manipulated by the U.S. ”

Annan had resigned as special envoy to Syria in frustration after organized leaks in the international press—including Reuters, NBC, Le Parisien, Le Canard Enchaîné, The Sunday Times, and Bild am Sonntag­—revealed that the US, Turkey, France, Britain and Germany were acting in concert to organize what Meyssan describes as a “vast secret war,” and that Barack Obama had authorized covert military intervention months earlier.  In his resignation, Annan referred euphemistically to “disunity” within the UN’s Security Council.

 

Source

Thierry Meyssan, “Syria ‘Regime Change’: The US-NATO-UN sponsored Brahimi Plan,” Global Research, September 06, 2012, http://www.globalresearch.ca/syria-regime-change-the-us-nato-un-sponsored-brahimi-plan/5303413

 

Student researcher: Jason Reyes (College of Marin)

Faculty evaluator: Susan Rahman (College of Marin)

Similar Posts:

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Print Friendly

  • Anonymous

    H.E.Kofi Annan was recently as good in Syria as at the UN during decades. 

    The new UN envoy is merely a next well-paid international bureaucrat whose career is depending mortally on an occurrence and longevity of conflicts worldwide.

    Anyway, the more such internal Islam-linked conflicts have been localised in situ – the more peaceful and secure the rest of the world is.

    Michael Kerjman

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • John Dennis Roberts

    The UN is simply doing what it was set up to do – further the interests of the western powers that created it in the first place. It routinely violates its own charter and is nothing more than a gravy train for superannuated politicians and a way of legitimizing the ongoing rape and pillage of the earth and its people in the name of quasi-fascist corporatism.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Order the New Book!
Log in -