<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tiny Troubles: Nanoparticles are Changing Everything From our Sunscreen to our Supplements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediafreedominternational.org/2009/11/05/tiny-troubles-nanoparticles-are-changing-everything-from-our-sunscreen-to-our-supplements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediafreedominternational.org/2009/11/05/tiny-troubles-nanoparticles-are-changing-everything-from-our-sunscreen-to-our-supplements/</link>
	<description>Media Democracy in Action</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:36:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Reimann</title>
		<link>http://www.mediafreedominternational.org/2009/11/05/tiny-troubles-nanoparticles-are-changing-everything-from-our-sunscreen-to-our-supplements/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>John Reimann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediafreedominternational.org/?p=360#comment-415</guid>
		<description>Chris writes: &quot;the potential that lie in these tiny little materials is exponential compared to the possible harm they may cause.&quot; But how does he know this? If the statistics on research money is to be believed, then the potential risks are unknown. The article compares nano technology to asbestos, but asbestos isn&#039;t the only example. Remember DDT? And the main point is that this is not just some new chemical - from what I understand this is more or less a new molecular structure. I am not opposed to nano-technology, but it does seem to me that the risks should be adequately explored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris writes: &#8220;the potential that lie in these tiny little materials is exponential compared to the possible harm they may cause.&#8221; But how does he know this? If the statistics on research money is to be believed, then the potential risks are unknown. The article compares nano technology to asbestos, but asbestos isn&#8217;t the only example. Remember DDT? And the main point is that this is not just some new chemical &#8211; from what I understand this is more or less a new molecular structure. I am not opposed to nano-technology, but it does seem to me that the risks should be adequately explored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.mediafreedominternational.org/2009/11/05/tiny-troubles-nanoparticles-are-changing-everything-from-our-sunscreen-to-our-supplements/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediafreedominternational.org/?p=360#comment-414</guid>
		<description>Chris - 

Yes there are benefits to most technologies however I would argue that the risks are at least equal or greater than the benefits in this case. You assume that all people, governments and scientist operate under the same moral code.  Morality aside mistakes happen with unintended effects.  This is evolutionary technology and that is the concern.  Take a minute to read this old essay by Bill Joy (Sun Micro Founder and really smart guy) and you may change your view.
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; </p>
<p>Yes there are benefits to most technologies however I would argue that the risks are at least equal or greater than the benefits in this case. You assume that all people, governments and scientist operate under the same moral code.  Morality aside mistakes happen with unintended effects.  This is evolutionary technology and that is the concern.  Take a minute to read this old essay by Bill Joy (Sun Micro Founder and really smart guy) and you may change your view.<br />
<a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Kostashuk</title>
		<link>http://www.mediafreedominternational.org/2009/11/05/tiny-troubles-nanoparticles-are-changing-everything-from-our-sunscreen-to-our-supplements/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Kostashuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediafreedominternational.org/?p=360#comment-412</guid>
		<description>Hi,

While I can appreciate your concern I&#039;m close friends with a PHD student whose work revolves around the applications of nanotechnology. With every new endeavour we are going to find new risks. However, the potential that lie in these tiny little materials is exponential compared to the possible harm they may cause. I recommend looking into the research that is being done with them in regards to solar energy, medicine, robotics, and materials engineering. This is truly evolutionary technology. 

-Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>While I can appreciate your concern I&#8217;m close friends with a PHD student whose work revolves around the applications of nanotechnology. With every new endeavour we are going to find new risks. However, the potential that lie in these tiny little materials is exponential compared to the possible harm they may cause. I recommend looking into the research that is being done with them in regards to solar energy, medicine, robotics, and materials engineering. This is truly evolutionary technology. </p>
<p>-Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
